Linköping University

In a recent article published in the program by Lars Sandman, Christian Munthe and Erik Gustavsson it is argued that shared decision-making can handle some of the criticisms against making patient responsible for choices affecting their health in a priority setting context. The main focus of the argument is that shared decision-making empowers the patient and take into consideration patient preferences in a way that could enable responsibility. However, it is also acknowledged that the two ideas about shared decision-making and making patients responsible for health choices do not share a common rationale and thereby do not support each other independently.
Read more

Currently members of the program (Sandman, Helgesson and Juth) are also working on an article exploring whether shared decision-making could also handle arguments against co-payment from the patient within generally publicly financed health-care systems.

Lars Sandman has been involved in a government project for the Swedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Assessment of Social Services (SBU) regarding patient participation in health care for chronically diseased patients where a report is due in the beginning of 2017.